Hans IJzerman asked me to write for the ‘News’ section at In-Mind. Specifically, I’ll be evaluating the quality of news items related to the fraud cases in social psychology.
Here‘s a first ‘headline’ on why Dave Nussbaum’s post on the Smeesters case deserves more attention.
Here‘s a second headline on the Smeesters case, describing that 5, not 3, papers contain suspicous data patterns.
Here‘s on that describes two problems with the Stanford Prison Experiment: (1) the experiment was pre-tested (2) the guards were told what to do. Repost at Psychology Today.